ICETSF 2027

3rd International Conference on Engineering and Technology for Sustainable Future


Paper Submission

Authors are invited to submit original research papers for the 3rd International Conference on Engineering and Technology for Sustainable Future.

Submit Your Paper

Authors must submit their papers electronically using the Microsoft CMT Submission System. The paper submission deadline is February 28, 2027.

Submit Paper via Microsoft CMT

For any inquiry, please contact: communication@icetsf.in

Submission Guidelines

  • Authors must strictly follow the Springer manuscript preparation guidelines.
  • Paper must be written in English using the standard Springer conference template.
  • Only PDF files will be accepted for the review process.
  • Maximum five authors are allowed in one paper.
  • The manuscript must fall within the conference scope and allied tracks.
  • Simultaneous submission to multiple conferences is not encouraged.
  • Papers with a maximum 15% similarity report will be considered for review, excluding bibliography.
  • All papers will undergo a rigorous single-blind review process.
  • At least one author of each accepted paper must register and present the paper at the conference.
  • Camera-ready paper submission and copyright transfer must be completed after acceptance.

Microsoft CMT Acknowledgment

The Microsoft CMT service was used for managing the peer-reviewing process for this conference. This service was provided for free by Microsoft and they bore all expenses, including costs for Azure cloud services as well as for software development and support.

Policy for Plagiarism

All submitted manuscripts will be subjected to similarity checking using a licensed version of iThenticate plagiarism detection software. Only articles with a similarity index of less than 15% will be considered for review. Submissions should also ensure less than 3% similarity from a single source.

Authors must submit original and unpublished research work that is not under consideration elsewhere. Manuscripts with a higher similarity index may be rejected at any stage of review. Authors are individually and collectively responsible for maintaining the highest ethical standards concerning plagiarism and publication integrity.

Important Instructions for AI-Generated Text

The use of content generated by artificial intelligence tools, including text, figures, images, and code, must be clearly disclosed in the acknowledgments section of the submitted paper. Authors must identify the AI system used, specify the sections where AI-generated content was used, and briefly explain the level of AI involvement. Failure to disclose such use may result in rejection without reviewer comments.

Peer Review Policy

ICETSF 2027 follows a single-blind peer-review process. The plagiarism check committee initially verifies each submitted manuscript using iThenticate. A maximum similarity of 15% with proper citations is permitted before the review process begins.

Each paper will be reviewed by a minimum of three subject experts. Papers will be selected based on technical quality, originality, relevance to the conference theme, significance, clarity, methodology, and ethical compliance.

Acceptance Criteria

Relevance: Alignment with conference themes and tracks.
Originality: Novel ideas, methods, or applications.
Technical Depth: Substantial contribution to the field.
Methodology: Robust and validated research design.
Clarity: Well-structured and clearly written paper.
Ethics: Responsible research, citation, and data practices.
Literature: Proper review of related work and research gaps.
Results: Quality analysis using tables, figures, and discussion.

Reviewer Ethics and Responsibilities

  • Reviewers must maintain confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.
  • Reviews must be objective, constructive, and free from personal criticism.
  • Reviewers must declare any conflict of interest and recuse themselves where required.
  • Reviewers must assess originality, ethical compliance, data integrity, clarity, and relevance.
  • Reviewer suggestions will include mandatory corrections, possible improvements, and future extension suggestions.
  • Papers will be rigorously evaluated based on novelty, significance, clarity, relevance, and repeatability.